🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.